QUALITIES OF LIFE
Put time on your side
Treatments synchronized with your body clock might make all the difference
Julie Deardorff
March 12, 2006
The clock was ticking for Frank Fazio. By the time his colon cancer was
discovered, the disease had spread to his abdomen, spine and bones.
But instead of undergoing conventional chemotherapy, Fazio, 64, literally tried
putting time on his side. Using the little-known practice of chronotherapy, the
Orland Park housing contractor received chemo drugs based on the internal
rhythms of his body and his illness.
It has been four decades since Western medicine began to acknowledge the
existence of the mysterious 24-hour body clock, proteins found throughout the
body that determine whether we're morning larks or night owls.
Although once considered entirely experimental, chronotherapy, or the practice
of synchronizing medical treatment with body time, is now commonly used to treat
everyday health problems, including sleep disorders, high blood pressure, asthma
and arthritis.
The cutting-edge use of chronotherapy is in cancer treatment, particularly
colorectal cancer, the second most common cause of cancer deaths in the U.S.
behind lung cancer. Though still in its infancy, some studies suggest that
chronotherapy can improve a drug's effectiveness while diminishing side effects
and toxicity.
Both chemotherapy and chronotherapy use the same powerful and poisonous drugs to
kill cancer cells, a process that inevitably damages the healthy cells. But
chemotherapy usually is done in a medical setting, according to a hospital's
schedule and needs.
The promise of drug chronotherapy, which uses the same old medications at
different times, lies in its individual and precisely timed approach. Ideally
the chemo drugs reach the cancerous cells at the most optimal moment for
destruction: as they are dividing. And it hits the healthy cells when they are
resting, which causes less damage.
"It allows for larger doses to be delivered more frequently, with higher
efficacy and lower toxicity," said pioneering chronobiologist William Hrushesky,
a senior clinical investigator at the Dorn VA Medical Center in South Carolina.
Chronotherapy began in Hrushesky's lab, which originally was at the University
of Minnesota.
"It's kinder, gentler and, at the same time, more aggressive and effective,"
Hrushesky said.
In addition, because patients aren't necessarily receiving treatment at a
hospital and saddled with cumbersome equipment, chronotherapy allows for some
semblance of a normal life during treatment, an emotional boost that helps
healing.
Equipped with a sporty fanny pack and a programmable, portable pump, chrono
patients can be hooked up to a catheter in the morning and receive their
treatments later in the day or during sleep.
A gradual increase
"The infusion starts slowly and ratchets up, hour by hour," said Dr. Keith
Block, who has been using chronotherapy at the Block Center for Integrative
Cancer Care in Evanston since 1998. "It slowly increases to the middle point of
the cycle, peaks, infuses most of the drug here, and then slowly ratchets back
down, to no drug, where the chrono cycle is completed."
Fazio, who was treated at the Block Center, often went for walks during chemo
treatment. Other Block patients have gone in-line skating along Lake Michigan,
practiced yoga or received massages as part of the center's holistic treatment
plan.
"I was very troubled by the adverse side effects and difficulty patients
experience when receiving chemo," said Block, who also directs the
integrative-medicine program at the College of Medicine at the University of
Illinois at Chicago.
The general practice of chronotherapy is controversial in part because most
doctors are schooled on the principle of homeostasis, the belief that the body
adapts to maintain balance. When we're hungry, we eat. When we're hot, we sweat.
Medications are taken once or twice daily (and often timed with meals to ensure
compliance), because it's thought that a steady level of an active drug is the
best way to tackle a disease.
But "the body is anything but constant," argued Michael Smolensky, co-author of
"The Body Clock Guide to Better Health" (Henry Holt, $17) and the director of
the Memorial-Hermann Chronobiology Center at the University of Texas at Houston.
"It may handle the same dose of the same medication in different ways at
different times of the day."
Yet chronotherapy faces both philosophical, logistical and technical hurdles. In
addition to Dorn in South Carolina, chronotherapy is offered only at the Block
Center and at the Cancer Treatment Centers of America location in Zion.
"It's fundamentally novel, difficult to set up and not something you can bill
extra for," said Hrushesky, who has been studying the body clock since 1976.
Chronobiologists have to consider the timing of both the drugs and the cancer
cells. Each drug has an ideal time when it should be given. Some research has
shown that 5-fluorouracil, a drug used for cancers of the colon, breast and
rectum, is best tolerated in the middle of a sleep cycle. So against colon
cancer, the drug would be administered between 10 p.m. and 10 a.m., when the
healthy cells are at rest and the cancer cells are most active.
Another cancer drug, oxaliplatin, has been shown to be more effective during the
day.
But "for the bulk of patients, you don't know exactly what the rhythm is and how
normal it is," said Dr. Gini Fleming, director of medical oncology, breast and
gynecology at the University of Chicago.
"The sicker someone is, the less likely they will have a normal rhythm. And you
don't know which rhythm determines a person's susceptibility to a drug effect.
There could be multiple reasons why a drug works better at certain times of
day," she said.
Part of integrative care
Fazio, who never tried traditional chemo, didn't need to understand the
technical aspects. After surgery, he opted for chonotherapy, which he received
over two days every other week, in part because his family felt he should have
an integrative approach to care.
"I knew chemotherapy was necessary," said Fazzio, now in full remission after
nine months of chrono and preparing to vacation in his homeland of Italy. "Just
as important was keeping my body strong to live well."
Other Block patients tried conventional chemo first and turned to Block as a
last resort. Dennis Simmons, 58, of Glendale Heights tried chronotherapy after
deciding that he would rather die than face another round of traditional chemo.
Simmons didn't just have trouble with the devastating side effects of the drugs,
including severe diarrhea, mouth sores and dehydration. He hated what he called
"the cattle-call style of treatment" that he received at a major medical center
in the Chicago area.
"You'd line up in the morning, get a big whomping shot of drugs and go home,"
said Simmons, who was first diagnosed in 2001. "It was quite devastating. It
just didn't seem that they were interested in any other type of treatment."
He started at the Block Center in 2001 and despite setbacks--his colon cancer
returned two years ago and metastasized to his lungs--he said chronotherapy was
easier on his body. "Before, I hardly wanted to get off the couch," he said. The
chronotherapy "gave some quality of life. I was able to be part of the family,
get around and have some sense of still being with the world."
Even better: His most recent scans show no evidence of disease.
Copyright © 2006,
Chicago Tribune